<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Bench Jockeys &#187; iowa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebenchjockeys.com/tag/iowa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebenchjockeys.com</link>
	<description>Inspired Content, Buzzworthy Discussion and Critical Analysis at the Intersection of Sports &#38; Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 21:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.29</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Hillary Opens Dem Polls on Top</title>
		<link>http://thebenchjockeys.com/2015/03/01/hillary-opens-dem-polls-on-top/</link>
		<comments>http://thebenchjockeys.com/2015/03/01/hillary-opens-dem-polls-on-top/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Paregol]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebenchjockeys.com/?p=1490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March 1, 2015 &#8211; Quinnipiac University conducted a telephone survey in Iowa during the week of February 16th seeking opinions about the projected field of Democratic candidates for 2016.  The survey involved 619 likely Democratic Caucus participants. The predictable results were released on February 26th. Democratic Party Iowans overwhelmingly backed Hillary Clinton (61%), with Elizabeth [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #999999; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://thebenchjockeys.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Hillary-Iowa.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1494" src="http://thebenchjockeys.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Hillary-Iowa-90x90.jpg" alt="Hillary Iowa" width="90" height="90" /></a>March 1, 2015 &#8211; Quinnipiac University conducted a telephone survey in Iowa during the week of February 16th seeking opinions about the projected field of Democratic candidates for 2016.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">The survey involved 619 likely Democratic Caucus participants. The predictable results were released on February 26th.</span> </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Democratic Party Iowans overwhelmingly backed Hillary Clinton (61%), with Elizabeth Warren earning runner-up honors at 19%.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Biden placed third with 7%, Sanders was fourth at 5% and Jim Webb finished in fifth at 2%.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Hillary maintains a stronghold on her path to the Democratic Party’s nomination and the odds that The Bench Jockeys have offered (1:7) seem in line with these results. </span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span><span style="color: #999999; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: medium;">[For those of you who read The Bench Jockeys and do not gamble, a 1:7 line means that you would have to bet $7 to win just $1.]</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Right now, Hillary is just that sure of a lock.</span></span> <span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: medium;">What was remarkable is that not one of the 619 Iowans who participated, voted for former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Not one</span></span><span style="font-size: medium;">.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">With only six potential candidates, Quinnipiac extended its inquiry to include a question about who the voters would support if their first choice opted not to run.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Even with Hillary out of the picture, O’Malley only secured 3% of the votes.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">18 of 619 votes.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Biden (30%) and Warren (23%) were the leading pretenders.</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">Look for Marty to take a page out of the Bill Clinton playbook and have his Celtic rock band &#8211; O’Malley’s March &#8211; booked on a few late night talk shows this summer if he cannot gain traction in this incomplete field.</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebenchjockeys.com/2015/03/01/hillary-opens-dem-polls-on-top/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 GOP Presidential Candidates Odds 2.0</title>
		<link>http://thebenchjockeys.com/2011/08/09/2012-gop-presidential-candidates-odds-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://thebenchjockeys.com/2011/08/09/2012-gop-presidential-candidates-odds-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Paregol]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Horseshoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebenchjockeys.com/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP hopefuls will be back at it again in Iowa on August 11th.   As the candidates size up one another under the watchful eye of FOX News, the Bench Jockeys thought it was time to separate the contenders from the pretenders and develop a tiered chart for easy review.  On this chart, we have [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP hopefuls will be back at it again in Iowa on August 11<sup>th</sup>.   As the candidates size up one another under the watchful eye of FOX News, the Bench Jockeys thought it was time to separate the contenders from the pretenders and develop a tiered chart for easy review.  On this chart, we have maintained our original opening odds from April 12, 2011 along with each candidate’s current odds to win the nomination (as we see it).  A separate designation (A) has been added for those candidate who have officially entered the fracas.</p>
<p>In this iteration of our odds-making, we have winnowed the field and have scratched Donald Trump, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham, Haley Barbour and Mitch Daniels to reflect their current intentions to remain on the sidelines.  However, if the citizenry truly begins to seek to limit Obama to one term,<span id="more-1077"></span> we would not discount the possibility of any of the above-named individuals re-entering the process.  David Petraeus, Conde Rice and Bob McDonnell seem to be either content with their existing positions or lack the moxie for a run at the Presidency so we have pulled them from the list.  Others who have not declared have now been relegated to our off-line fourth tier and have been dropped from this GOP Nom 2.0 list.  Those seeking to examine our original 40 candidate list will find a jump-link below:</p>
<p><a href="http://thebenchjockeys.com/the-bench-jockeys-set-odds-on-the-2012-presidential-hopefuls/">http://thebenchjockeys.com/the-bench-jockeys-set-odds-on-the-2012-presidential-hopefuls/</a></p>
<p>We will continue to maintain the comprehensive list on a stand alone page, keeping our odds current while considering trending.</p>
<p>Tier 1</p>
<table border="0" width="450" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<colgroup span="1">
<col span="1" width="123" />
<col span="1" width="139" />
<col span="1" width="43" />
<col span="1" width="74" />
<col span="1" width="71" /> </colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="123" height="20"><strong>Candidate</strong></td>
<td width="139"><strong>Background</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Status</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="74"><strong>Open</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="71"><strong>Current</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Mitt Romney</td>
<td>Former Gov &#8211; MA</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7:2</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Tim Pawlenty</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Current Gov &#8211; MN</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Rick Perry</td>
<td>Current Gov &#8211; TX</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">50:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">12:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Ron Paul</td>
<td>Current US Rep &#8211; TX</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"> A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">15:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Jim DeMint</td>
<td>Current US Sen &#8211; SC</td>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">14:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">18:1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Tier 2</p>
<table border="0" width="450" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<colgroup span="1">
<col span="1" width="123" />
<col span="1" width="139" />
<col span="1" width="43" />
<col span="1" width="74" />
<col span="1" width="71" /> </colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="123" height="20"><strong>Candidate</strong></td>
<td width="139"><strong>Background</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="43"><strong>Status</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="74"><strong>Open</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="71"><strong>Current</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Michele Bachmann</td>
<td>Current US Rep &#8211; MN</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">22:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Herman Cain</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Former Fed Reserve</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Chris Christie</td>
<td>Current Gov &#8211; NJ</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">18:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Marco Rubio</td>
<td>Current US Sen &#8211; FL</td>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">20:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Bobby Jindal</td>
<td>Current Gov &#8211; LA</td>
<td style="text-align: center;"></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">30:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">30:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Sarah Palin</td>
<td>Former Gov &#8211; AK</td>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">35:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Jon Huntsman</td>
<td>Former Gov &#8211; UT</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">40:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">35:1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Although we have downgraded him with respect to the 2012 election, we absolutely see Marco Rubio as a potential VP candidate.  The old guard Republicans would be wise to include Rubio on their ticket in an effort to pass the torch to the next gen of the GOP while they can still wield some influence on him.   Considering the expanding Latino demographic shift in the US, Rubio’s oratory strength and his fiscally conservative economic platform, his selection by the party should be a no-brainer.  But then again, the GOP paired John McCain with “the maverick” in 2008, so who knows….</p>
<p>Tier 3</p>
<table border="0" width="450" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<colgroup span="1">
<col span="1" width="123" />
<col span="1" width="139" />
<col span="1" width="43" />
<col span="1" width="74" />
<col span="1" width="71" /> </colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="123" height="20"><strong>Candidate</strong></td>
<td width="139"><strong>Background</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Status</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="74"><strong>Open</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="71"><strong>Current</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Jeb Bush</td>
<td>Former Gov &#8211; FL</td>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">50:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">50:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Newt Gingrich</td>
<td>Former Spkr of House</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">12:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">60:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Allen West</td>
<td>Current US Rep &#8211; FL</td>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">100:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">80:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Rudy Giuliani</td>
<td>Former Mayor &#8211; NYC</td>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">200:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">200:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Rick Santorum</td>
<td>Former US Sen &#8211; PA</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1000:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">250:1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Tier 4 &#8211; Announced candidates with zippy chance of winning</p>
<table border="0" width="450" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<colgroup span="1">
<col span="1" width="123" />
<col span="1" width="139" />
<col span="1" width="43" />
<col span="1" width="74" />
<col span="1" width="71" /> </colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="123" height="20"><strong>Candidate</strong></td>
<td width="139"><strong>Background</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Status</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="74"><strong>Open</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="71"><strong>Current</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Thad McCotter</td>
<td>Current US Rep &#8211; MI</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">none</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">750:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Gary Johnson</td>
<td>Former Gov &#8211; NM</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">500:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1000:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Buddy Roemer</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">Former Gov &#8211; LA</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5000:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5000:1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">Fred Karger</td>
<td>Political Consultant</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">A</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">a trillion:1</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">a trillion:1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebenchjockeys.com/2011/08/09/2012-gop-presidential-candidates-odds-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
