Libya: 100 Days & Counting
Posted in International Political Scene, The Horseshoe, US Politics on July 1st, 2011 by Ian ParegolDuring the initial days of Operation Odyssey Dawn, the Bench Jockeys wrote about our take on President Obama’s decision to partner with NATO forces in supporting air strikes in Libya. (See http://thebenchjockeys.com/2011/03/22/odyssey-dawn-whats-that-flower-you-have-on/ and http://thebenchjockeys.com/2011/04/05/butler-fails-to-execute-while-us-may-be-executing-to-fail/ ) Now over 100 days into what was deemed a “limited” operation in Libya, we are still asking: What is the objective of our military involvement in Libya?
Both Democrats and Republicans oppose the intervention for an array of reasons:
- the cost of the effort,
- the potential for escalation and the US long-term role in a prolonged civil war,
- the message it sends to other countries about the US definition of sovereignty, and
- the lack of defined objectives
But the true Congressional opposition lies in the potential for unchecked military action in the Executive Branch by the weakening of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 (WPR). By soft-peddling the President’s actions in Libya, the Administration has Read more »